Husni Hanadzlah’s Earth-Shattering Speech
3 December 2009 | 1,858 views | View blog reactionsAddress and Official Opening
YB Dato’ Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah, Minister of Finance II Malaysia
on the occasion of the “National Economic Outlook Conference 2010-2011”
Tuesday, 1 December 2009, at 9.00 a.m.
YBhg Tan Sri Dato’ Mohd Sheriff Mohd Kassim
Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Malaysian Institute of Economic Research – MIER
YBhg Members of the Board of Trustees and Advisory Panel of MIER
YBhg Emeritus Professor Datuk Dr Mohamed Ariff
Executive Director of MIER
YBhg Tan Sri-Tan Sri and Dato’-Dato’, Your Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen
Good morning everyone
I thank MIER for inviting me to officiate the opening ceremony of MIER’s “National Economic Outlook Conference 2010-2011. It is an honour and a great pleasure for me to be here.
Ladies and Gentlemen
1. The Government intends to revise its estimate for next year’s GDP growth from 3.0% upwards. We have identified several sources of growth and we will enhance our capacity through domestic demand. We are also looking to strengthen the private sector’s contribution to the GDP through the Government-linked companies. We have identified several projects in the pipeline and we will bring them forward for implementation in the first quarter of next year. We are reasonably confident that a target of 5.0% is achievable.
2. Next year we will unveil the Tenth Malaysian Plan. We will focus on initiatives to revitalise private initiative as the primary engine of growth. In this respect, we will improve the dynamics of competition in the domestic marketplace, focus on technology and innovation in niche areas including green and bio technologies. We will develop these niches on existing comparative advantages and provide soft & hard infrastructure for the knowledge economy.
3. With all these, we will create new catalysts of growth, boost demand for knowledge workers and skilled labour, raise private and social returns to education and skills upgrading, and a more balanced internal economic structure with a bigger role for domestic demand. Externally, we will also continue to further promote closer economic, trade and financial linkages within the region.
4. For the longer term, our Prime Minister has tasked the New Economic Advisory Council (NEAC) to develop a new economic model to transform the country into a high income economy. This journey will be an exciting as it would represent the single biggest transformative process since the introduction of the New Economic Policy in 1970.
5. There will be many changes. Quoting the Prime Minister, business is not as usual. Fundamental and structural economic reforms are critical if our economy is to be transformed successfully. Malaysia is trapped in a low-value-added, low wage and low productivity structure. While Singapore and Korea’s nominal per capita GDP grew within the last three decades by 9 and 12 times, respectively, ours only by a factor of 4.
6. Amongst our peers, China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines and Thailand, our real GDP growth in the last three years was the second lowest at 5.5%. Our manufacturing sector is not investing up the value chain while our services sector remains low in growth and under-developed.
7. The transformation is particularly urgent when we take the external environment into account. The global environment is changing. We can no longer rely on our traditional trading partners and we need to address the competitive pressure from other emerging markets on our existing exports.
8. Our economy has been stagnating in the last decade. We have lost our competitive edge to remain as the leader of the pack in many sectors of the economy. Our private investment has been steadily in decline. Our private investment is now half of what it was since the Asian crisis while both manufacturing and service sectors have become less capital intensive. For the period 2000 to 2007, our investment per value-added in percentage nominal terms in manufacturing dropped from 30.6% to 21.7% while the services sector, the decline is from 26.8% to 22.1%.
9. We need to restore the private sector’s role in the economy, serving as the primary engine of growth. How do we re-catalyse the private sector? In this regard, I wish to take this opportunity to articulate the concept of 1Malaysia in economic terms. There are some quarters, the cynics and the pessimists, whom view the 1Malaysia concept as another slogan gimmick. I assure you, it is not. We know that the bumiputras do not hold the bulk of Malaysia’s wealth. A simple analysis of our capital account will show that there has been a continuous outflow of capital from our shores. In this mobile world, capital will always flow to jurisdictions that are perceived to be more secure, not necessarily the ones that give a higher return.
10. Therefore, we have to rebuild an environment that gives confidence to the private investors. The critical pillars for us to restore confidence are leadership and governance, macroeconomic stability, market driven resource mobility, strong and effective institutions and a knowledge and innovation society. Allow me to articulate these five pillars, one by one.
First: Leadership and Governance
11. Political stability is a necessary component of leadership, especially so in a government that is based on a coalition of component parties. If there is to be continuity in a leadership structure that has the track record of a successful economy manager, Malaysians have to embrace acceptance of our differences and diversities which have been the base of our coalition. We also recognise that all Malaysians must be given equal opportunity to participate in the economy. Performance must be the primary rod of measurement. In this regard, we have announced that there will no longer direct negotiations for any public projects unless it is for the procurement that is related to national defence and security matters. There have been concerns that the Government is abandoning the bumiputras. This will not happen. The responsibility to develop and improve the economic standing of the bumiputras is the bedrock of this Administration’s mandate.
12. Nevertheless, we have to do it differently. There may have been a number of bumiputras who are awarded contracts whom are not genuine entrepreneurs. Yes, we encourage collaboration, of course. Consortiums and strategic alliances are a good thing but there must be a demonstrable element of genuine collaboration. For years the Government has denounced this “Ali Baba’ syndrome. It’s about time we get tough on it. Meritocracy must prevail. This is necessary for the long term economic survival of the bumiputras, of ourselves.
13. If we are to ensure there is fairness in the marketplace, there must also be a corresponding strengthening of our public institutions. Transparency and adherence to the highest standards of governance is something that we must strive towards. In this regard, we wish to see greater participation from all races in the public institutions, where performance is the key measurement. The introduction of NKRAs and KPIs is the first step in that direction.
Second: Macroeconomic Stability
14. Moving forward, we have to ensure that our fiscal position is restored to a more sustainable level. While the broad objective of increasing private investment in the economy will be continuously pursued, from the Treasury’s point of view, we also need to ensure that we receive optimal return from our hard-earned tax revenue. There have been too many leakages in the past and less than productive spending.
15. I do not for one minute underestimate the difficulty of achieving this. One of the most difficult things that anyone in management can tell you is “cultural change”. How can anyone change a cultural mindset that has been ingrained for so many years? But I have faith. Malaysians had developed all these centuries a strong survival gene. When push comes to shove, we change. The key is – there must be someone or something to do the shoving. The world is changing and that’s the biggest shove that I can think of.
Third: Market-driven Resource Mobility
16. The Government spends RM8,000.00 per capita annually in numerous subsidies . Not only this places a huge weight on our operating expenditure but it also create distortions in our marketplace. We need to realign this. We will re-calibrate the distribution of the subsidies. We want to ensure there is greater precision in its application. Nonetheless, we also want to ensure that there will be no erosion in the standards of living for the underprivileged and the poor, regardless of race or ethnicity.
17. We must also consider the gradual dismantling of our open-ended protection of specific sectors and industries which have introduced a climate of complacency and artificial levels of supply. The long term success of the nation’s economy must take precedence over the short term interests of a few protected groups.
Fourth: Strong and Effective Institutions
18. Entrepreneurs need to know that the public institutions are transparent and are run by the highest standards of governance. Entrepreneurs need to know that they do not compete in a market whereby their competitors seemed to possess institutional advantage. We need to see better competition policies and better regulatory environment which can allow market forces to operate in an orderly manner.
Fifth: Knowledge and Innovation-Driven Society
19. One of the biggest challenges that we face is the development of an innovative knowledge-driven society. Fortunately, we have a substantial middle class whom understands the value of knowledge. Unfortunately, our institutions of higher education have proven to be a disappointment. The mismatch between our industry’s needs and the output from the local universities has resulted in Malaysia having the highest unemployment rate of graduates, at close to 4.0%, compared to, for example, Ireland, Korea and Singapore.
We have to consider introducing greater competition in our halls of higher learning. We have to introduce greater diversity in the range of capabilities in the members of the academia. If there is a lack of self-induced factors in our in our undergraduates and academics to strive for greater performance, maybe we should introduce external factors to drive excellence.
20. If there is one operative word that runs through consistently in all the points that I have just put across to you just now, the word would be competition. 1Malaysia equals inclusivity and by being inclusive, we introduce competition. We have to increase the level of competition in all the relevant sectors of our economy. To those that compete and win, there will be a set of rewards in terms of higher wages and awards. A performance-based culture does not accept mediocrity. We want to see a steady decline in those that suffer from the “dependency syndrome”.
21. Countries that have made successful transition into a high-income economy such Japan, Korea and Singapore have a single commonality – their workforce has strong work ethics, a disciplined mind and the hunger to succeed.
Ladies and gentlemen
22. Historically, Malaysia never subscribed to any dogmatic approach to any particular ideology or economic school of thought. We are pragmatic people. Malaysia is a unique country that has its own particular set of dynamics. However, in a globalised world where economic and financial integration is inevitable, there will be a greater level of equalisation in our market economy with other participating economies. We cannot participate in half way measures although in our own pragmatic way, we will participate in ways and means that are prudent and cautious so as not to disrupt the existing equilibrium too much. A measured approach is called for but the end-destination is clear.
23. The journey ahead is certainly exciting but also daunting. The next decade will prove to be a period of unprecedented change in this Nation’s economic history since the last thirty years. Indeed, we are embarking on this adventure in a period where the external environment is also going through a level of transformation that is unparalleled since the conclusion of World War II. The challenges are great but if we persevere, God willing, we shall succeed.
24. I trust this conference will address these and other relevant issues so as to provide inputs not only for the policy-makers but also the captains of industries in the private sector. I wish you all a very successful and fruitful conference.
25. I thank the Chairman and the Board of Trustees of MIER for extending today’s kind invitation. I also thank the delegates to this conference for putting aside their time and efforts for this important annual event.
Ladies and Gentlemen
It is my honour and pleasure to declare MIER’s “National Economic Outlook Conference 2010-2011” officially open. Thank you.
Follow Me
17 November 2009 | 851 views | View blog reactionsJustice In 1Malaysia Land
22 October 2009 | 2,215 views | View blog reactionsLingam’s case is closed, would you believe it.
First of all, if you read the New Straits Times and other newspapers, you will come away confused as to who said Lingam’s case was closed.
NST on its front page had Najib replying to Lim Guan Eng’s question in Parliament on the matter.
Good for them that they put the story on the front page.
The other newspapers buried it inside, but they had Nazri answering Lim’s question.
Big mix-up but then again, no big deal. After all, UMNO leaders are all pimps as far as I’m concerned.
The closing of the Lingam files has got to be one of the biggest cover-ups in our country’s history.
In the future, our grandchildren will watch a five-part History channel documentary on it … that is, if we and our children are not stupid enough to vote UMNO/Barisan Nasional again and again and again.
Tell your children about this when they’re old enough to understand. Teach them well.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry that was formed to probe into the case comprised former Chief Judge of Malaya Haidar Mohamed Noor former Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Steve Shim Lip Kiong, former Solicitor-General Zaitun Zawiyah Puteh, historian Khoo Kay Kim and retired Court of Appeal Judge Mahadev Shankar.
They found that:
1. The video clip was authentic;
2. Lingam was in conversation with Ahmad Fairuz over judicial appointments;
3. There was direct influence by Lingam in the elevation of judges, in particular in the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as president of the Court of Appeal, with the possible aim of his further appointment as chief justice; and;
4. Lingam had asked tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan and Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor to involve themselves actively in the appointment of judges, in particular the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as the Chief Judge of Malaya and subsequently, president of the Court of Appeal.The commission identified six people to be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961, the Sedition Act 1961, the Legal Profession Act 1976, the Official Secrets Act 1972 and the Penal Code.
They are former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Lingam, Tan, Umno secretarygeneral Tengku Adnan, Eusoff Chin and Ahmad Fairuz. [New Straits Times]
Najib/Nazri said investigations were carried out but there was no solid evidence for further action.
It must be then that the members of the commission, eminently qualified and vastly experienced though they were, were seeing things that were not there when they made their findings.
This must have been a case of collective hallucination, if Najib/Nazri and the whole apparatus of the establishment are to be believed.
Maybe we should institute another Royal Commission into this Royal Commission.
All this ties in nicely with what happened a few days ago, when Anwar’s appeal on his RM100m lawsuit against Dr M was struck out.
It was struck out because his application was not submitted in Bahasa Malaysia.
Brilliant.
Such is justice in 1Malaysia land.
Najib’s 1Malaysia. Where the executive and the judiciary are truly united.
Now Najib wants to complete the circle by bringing in the legislative into his 1Malaysia unity.
The legislative branch of the state is the only one in which we Malaysians have some semblance of a say, some measure of control, some degree of power.
This was evident on March 8 2008.
Come the next general election, Najib wants to you to give it all to him.
Before you do, think of Altantuya. Think of Lingam. Then think of your children.
You put your trust in Najib at your own peril and more importantly, that of your children.
MAHATHIR is safe now.
He won’t bother Najib no more.
A Big Fat Hand In Everything
21 October 2009 | 969 views | View blog reactions
Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water … we get wind of new allegations thrown at Rosmah.
I thought the furore had died down over this intriguing wife of the Prime Minister and that her handlers had steadily managed public perception with all the stuff she’s been doing since Rosmah took offi … I mean, since Najib took office.
But lo and behold, first we have this:
… Menurut sumber dalaman Umno isteri tercinta Perdana Menteri, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor dilaporkan menggunakan jet peribadi milik Ketua Pegawai Eksekutif Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB), Datuk Seri Tiong King Sing yang dikaitkan dengan skandal Zon Bebas Pelabuhan Klang (PKFZ).
Beliau dikatakan telah mengguna salah sebuah jet mewah kepunyaan Tiong beberapa kali untuk tujuan peribadi. [Malaysia Today]
No shit, Sherlock? Now every politician (and his wife) can fly.
And this:
… kaitan Rosmah dengan Deepak Jaikishan, salah seorang daripada lima pengarah sebuah syarikat, Carpet Raya Sdn Bhd (492434-H).
… Dokumen Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM) menunjukkan kesemua mereka memiliki jumlah saham yang sama banyak dengan modal berbayar RM8.7 juta.
Akaun terakhir syarikat yang didaftar 10 tahun lalu menunjukkan syarikat itu memiliki aset hampir RM90 juta dengan tanggungan keseluruhan RM67 juta dan simpanan melebihi RM12 juta.
Secara rasmi, pendapatan syarikat pada 2005 adalah RM122 juta dan keuntungannya lebih RM7 juta tapi nilai sebenarnya dijangka jauh melebihi angka berkenaan.
Keuntungan besar syarikat yang menjalankan perniagaan menjual karpet itu menimbulkan kecurigaan.
Nilai pendapatan dan keuntungan itu terlalu menjolok mata untuk sebuah perniagaan karpet.
Talk about carpetbaggers, eh?
And most disturbing is this:
Pegawai kanan Kementerian Kewangan dikatakan semakin gusar dengan campurtangan Rosmah Mansor, isteri Perdana Menteri, dalam urusan Perbendaharaan Negara, termasuk penyediaan Belanjawan 2010 dan pemberian kontrak dan tender kerajaan.
Sumber-sumber kerajaan berkata campurtangan itu sudah di “tahap kritikal’ dengan Rosmah mempertikaikan keputusan tertentu Timbalan Perdana Menteri Muhyyiddin Yassin dan Ketua Setiausaha Negara Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan.
… Rosmah menaruh minat yang amat mendalam terhadap penyediaan Bajet 2010 yang akan dibentangkan oleh Perdana Menteri di Parlimen pada sesi Persidangan Dewan Rakyat 23 Oktober depan.
Isteri kedua Najib itu dikatakan mempunyai akses kepada semua bahan-bahan serta dokumen yang berkaitan dengan belanjawan tersebut sehinggakan menimbulkan rasa gelisah dan tidak senang hati di kalangan pegawai tinggi kementerian. [Malaysia Today]
The tabling of the Budget is just days away.
We should follow it closely.
Night Of The Living 1Malaysians
18 October 2009 | 1,124 views | View blog reactionsThis 1Malaysia thing is everywhere. There’s no escaping it. It’s all over the place.
It’s like Najib is trying to pummel you into submission by carpet-bombing you with 1Malaysia. Over and over and over again. It’s like brain washing.
The way this is going, we’ll all turn into 1Malaysia zombies sooner than you can say “Ketuanan Melayu”.
Its easy to spot the people who have caught the fever — they give you the 1Malaysia finger every chance they get.
Fingering unity: People in happy, happy 1Malaysia land are generous with their smiles. Except for the dude on the right (arrowed). He strikes a Travolta-esque pose worthy of Saturday Night Fever that shows he takes his 1Malaysia seriously. Either that or he’s an MIC member.
|
Don’t get me wrong. I’m all for unity.
It’s just that what they don’t tell you about 1Malaysia is that it is Malay-led unity.
I got no problems with that either, as long as the Malays who lead are leaders on merit, not solely because they are Malay.
Blog Update
30 September 2009 | 1,507 views | View blog reactionsI know I haven’t been blogging for a while so I apologise if you’ve been coming here often to see if there’s anything new and finding that there is not much.
Been havin’ a ball on Twitter so if you wanna get kinda like an up-to-the minute update of the ramblings in my mind, follow me @Aisehman.
Not abandoning the blog though. This space is gonna be used for more reasoned observations and arguments. The elections are just a few years away so I got a lot of work to do.
You’ll read more and more postings in Bahasa Malaysia over here, as @Khairykj (yes, that KJ, the Kool Jantan) inspired me to also reach out to my Melayu bros and sistahs who are more comfortable with the vernacular if I wanted to change their minds.
He’s right.
So, if you need a daily Aisehman fix, Twitter is where you can get me.
Stay tuned, don’t touch that dial, and remember: This is our country, damn it. OURS. Not UMNO’s.
Selamat Hari Raya
19 September 2009 | 1,432 views | View blog reactions… to everyone.
Drive safely and don’t eat too much.
Get Shorty
10 September 2009 | 1,812 views | View blog reactionsLOL, shorty here is not about to keep a “low profile”:
Former Umno vice-president Tan Sri Mohd Isa Abdul Samad today dismissed the suggestion that he would be a liability to Barisan Nasional if he is fielded in the Bagan Pinang by-election.
“In the opposition, even a former prisoner could contest,” Isa told a press conference in an apparent reference to Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who was imprisoned for six years.
“I’m not a criminal,” he added. [Malaysian Insider]
Of course Isa’s not a criminal.
If you bought votes, then you are guilty of corruption. Our laws are clear on that.
But while UMNO found Isa guilty of vote-buying, it did not see fit to report him to what was then known as the Anti-Corruption Agency.
Isa escaped punishment from the law simply because he was an UMNO member. It’s as simple as that.
So, while legally Isa not a criminal, in the minds of many people, he fuckin’ is.
During happier times: Shorty was riding high (LOL) then, smiling away in his tall (ROTFL) songkok. Of the five Nazgul pictured here, two are but a shadow of their former selves, while one still reigns in his neck of the woods.
|
Now, if Najib really wants to walk his fuckin’ talk about “cleaning up” UMNO, then the logical thing to do would be to pick someone else as the Barisan Nasional candidate for Bagan Pinang.
It don’t matter if Barisan will win hands down were Isa to contest. It don’t matter if the people of Bagan Pinang perversely prefer a corrupt man.
What matters is whether Najib will take this opportunity to provide evidence that he’s the real deal, or not.
If he gives Isa the nod, then it’s clear that Najib is nothing more than hype.
And I suspect he will pick Isa. He needs to be doubly sure that Barisan/UMNO wins this one.
Najib has lost too many by-elections already.
So go ahead, Mr Prime Minister.
Make my fuckin’ day.
The Dog’s Day In Court
8 September 2009 | 2,659 views | View blog reactionsKena:
Bowing to public pressure, the government is expected to charge the cow head protestors under the Sedition Act and for illegal assembly.
The Attorney-General Tan Sri Gani Patail confirmed the charges today.
The protestors are likely to be charged tomorrow in Shah Alam.
… “I have decided to charge those who carried and spoke while stepping on the cow head under Sect 4 (1) of the Sedition Act alternatively Section 298 of the Penal Code.
“They as well the other demonstrators will also face another charge under section 27 (5) of the Police Act for illegal assembly,” Gani said in the press statement today. [Malaysian Insider]
Section 4 (1) of the Sedition Act states that:
4. (1) Any person who—
(a) does or attempts to do, or makes any preparation to do,or conspires with any person to do, any act which has or which would, if done, have a seditious tendency;
(b) utters any seditious words;
(c) prints, publishes, sells, offers for sale, distributes orreproduces any seditious publication; or
(d) imports any seditious publication,
shall be guilty of an offence and shall, on conviction, be liable fora first offence to a fine not exceeding five thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years or to both, and,for a subsequent offence, to imprisonment for a term not exceedingfive years; and any seditious publication found in the possessionof the person or used in evidence at his trial shall be forfeited andmay be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the court directs.
Now, much as I am disgusted with the actions of the dog who stepped on the cow head, I am not sure he will receive true justice for his actions if he were charged under the Sedition Act.
Not that I doubt he will be found guilty and probaby get fined, but I do not agree that a person can and should be found guilty of sedition without determining whether he had intended to commit sedition.
Sedition is defined by the Oxford English Dictionary as:
Conduct or speech inciting rebellion against the authority of a state or monarch.
Clearly, in the act of inciting rebellion against authority there must be an element of intention to incite rebellion.
Even if you define sedition a little more loosely as an incitement to public disorder, there must be intention.
The Sedition Act however does not give a damn what your intentions are; only that your actions “have a seditious tendency”.
Obviously, there is a seditious tendency in stepping on a cow’s head in a public protest against the building of a Hindu temple.
But did the UMNO dog, through his actions, intend to incite rebellion against the authority of a state?
Did he intend to incite public disorder?
We must be careful here. There must be and there is a difference between a valid public protest and rebellion against authority or the incitement to public disorder.
If I were to be honest with myself, I do not believe he committed an act of sedition.
The Attorney-General could charge the dog under Section 298 of the Penal Code, as suggested:
Whoever, with deliberate intention of wounding the religious feelings of any person, utters any word or makes any sound in the hearing of that person, or makes any gesture in the sight of that person, or places any object in the sight of that person, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.
Here, you need to prove “deliberate intention”.
Of course the dog will deny it. He will likely put up what I would call the Bodoh Macam Lembu Defence. It can also be called the Lembu Dicucuk Hidung Defence.
Do not laugh, for it is a formidable defence.
If the dog can convince the judge that he did not know the cow was sacred to Hindus, and that all he intended to do was to publicly and forcefully communicate his opinion that the Selangor Menteri Besar and the Pakatan Rakyat representatives directly involved in the controvery were “bodoh macam lembu” or that their actions in defending the temple relocation were “seperti lembu dicucuk hidung, our man will have a fair chance of being found not guilty of deliberately intending to wound the religious feelings of Hindus in the country.
Now, is it possible that a dog of his circumstances and standing does not know that the cow is sacred to Hindus?
That is for the judge to decide.
I would say no, because I believe most adult Malays in this country know this.
Even more so a dog who is in politics and is an UMNO community leader.
But it also must be decided whether the dog, any dog, still has the right to conduct a “cow head protest”, bearing in mind the well-known Malay sayings, “bodoh macam lembu” and “seperti lembu dicucuk hidung”, or whether the protection of “religious feelings” absolutely over-ride all other considerations.
Running Dog
7 September 2009 | 1,713 views | View blog reactions
This is the face of Malay extremism.
This is the dude who carried the severed head of a cow to the protest the other day.
This is the dude who had his foot on the cow head.
And as you can see from this picture, this is also the dude who disrupted the Selangor government dialogue with Section 23 residents.
His name is Azmir Md Zain.
Some say he is HAJI Azmir Md Zain but I kinda doubt that.
Haji apa kalau perangai macam anjin’?
Tuk aku, pak aku, pak penakan aku semua haji, tapi takdak la perangai anjin’ macam ni.
Pasai tu la susah sikit aku nak pecaya Azmir ni haji.
Anjin’ mungkin la.
Anjin’ UMNO.
Azmir ni adalah Pengerusi Penaja Umno Cawangan Seksyen 23.
Dua beradik dengan Dato’ Nawawi Md Zin, Ketua Bahagian UMNO Shah Alam.
Nawawi dan Azmir ni barua kehormat Khir Toyo.
Memang depa bedua ni anjin’.
Anjin’ penjilat Tempe.
