Justice In 1Malaysia Land
22 October 2009 | 1,950 viewsLingam’s case is closed, would you believe it.
First of all, if you read the New Straits Times and other newspapers, you will come away confused as to who said Lingam’s case was closed.
NST on its front page had Najib replying to Lim Guan Eng’s question in Parliament on the matter.
Good for them that they put the story on the front page.
The other newspapers buried it inside, but they had Nazri answering Lim’s question.
Big mix-up but then again, no big deal. After all, UMNO leaders are all pimps as far as I’m concerned.
The closing of the Lingam files has got to be one of the biggest cover-ups in our country’s history.
In the future, our grandchildren will watch a five-part History channel documentary on it … that is, if we and our children are not stupid enough to vote UMNO/Barisan Nasional again and again and again.
Tell your children about this when they’re old enough to understand. Teach them well.
The Royal Commission of Inquiry that was formed to probe into the case comprised former Chief Judge of Malaya Haidar Mohamed Noor former Chief Judge of Sabah and Sarawak Steve Shim Lip Kiong, former Solicitor-General Zaitun Zawiyah Puteh, historian Khoo Kay Kim and retired Court of Appeal Judge Mahadev Shankar.
They found that:
1. The video clip was authentic;
2. Lingam was in conversation with Ahmad Fairuz over judicial appointments;
3. There was direct influence by Lingam in the elevation of judges, in particular in the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as president of the Court of Appeal, with the possible aim of his further appointment as chief justice; and;
4. Lingam had asked tycoon Tan Sri Vincent Tan and Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor to involve themselves actively in the appointment of judges, in particular the appointment of Ahmad Fairuz as the Chief Judge of Malaya and subsequently, president of the Court of Appeal.The commission identified six people to be investigated under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1961, the Sedition Act 1961, the Legal Profession Act 1976, the Official Secrets Act 1972 and the Penal Code.
They are former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Lingam, Tan, Umno secretarygeneral Tengku Adnan, Eusoff Chin and Ahmad Fairuz. [New Straits Times]
Najib/Nazri said investigations were carried out but there was no solid evidence for further action.
It must be then that the members of the commission, eminently qualified and vastly experienced though they were, were seeing things that were not there when they made their findings.
This must have been a case of collective hallucination, if Najib/Nazri and the whole apparatus of the establishment are to be believed.
Maybe we should institute another Royal Commission into this Royal Commission.
All this ties in nicely with what happened a few days ago, when Anwar’s appeal on his RM100m lawsuit against Dr M was struck out.
It was struck out because his application was not submitted in Bahasa Malaysia.
Brilliant.
Such is justice in 1Malaysia land.
Najib’s 1Malaysia. Where the executive and the judiciary are truly united.
Now Najib wants to complete the circle by bringing in the legislative into his 1Malaysia unity.
The legislative branch of the state is the only one in which we Malaysians have some semblance of a say, some measure of control, some degree of power.
This was evident on March 8 2008.
Come the next general election, Najib wants to you to give it all to him.
Before you do, think of Altantuya. Think of Lingam. Then think of your children.
You put your trust in Najib at your own peril and more importantly, that of your children.
MAHATHIR is safe now.
He won’t bother Najib no more.
15 Responses to “Justice In 1Malaysia Land”
1 frankie 22 October 2009 @ 3:02 pm
1 Malaysia boleh kau tim.
2 1malaysia 22 October 2009 @ 3:57 pm
Even Communist country like china dont really have control on all the 3 branches!
legislative, executive, judiciary and enforcement all in 1pocket.
But i think this is not even news. Dont tell me you are surprised by this?
3 justice 22 October 2009 @ 3:59 pm
hahahahaha ….. now v can promote another attraction in our tourism list
kangaroo court ^_^”
4 mridzuan 22 October 2009 @ 4:08 pm
I cursed out loud when I heard it on the radio this morning. I spit on the faces of these shameless creatures.
people should start sending emails, calling and writing letters to PM’s department, thanking them for legalizing perversion of justice.
5 G 22 October 2009 @ 4:23 pm
Ah yes, but there is one Supreme Court waiting for us all in the hereafter…..and the judgment is fair and swift!!!
6 malaysiawave 22 October 2009 @ 4:59 pm
Mahathir is safe? Safe from what ??? There is the lifeafter where he will appear before the greatest judge of all. Going to be a hot hot affair. Safe for now hehehe.
7 flyer168 30 October 2009 @ 8:39 am
Good one there & I take my hat off to you for your fine effort to highlight the shortcomings…..
You know, I know & they also know that Rhetorics & Lies if properly “managed” like what Tok Mat DID then & now revealed in his book….DOES WORK….
MAN’s memory last 3 MONTH only, so….EAT YOUR HEART OUT STUPID CITIZENS ! lol.
Cheers.
8 donplaypuks 30 October 2009 @ 6:26 pm
Bro
They are lying through their teeth and engaging in semantics to try and pull the wool over our eyes.
NFA means just that – No Further Action. It means they “think” there is no basis for prosecution. It means they WILL NOT prosecute because it will open up the pandora’s box about more corrupt judges, lawyers and Tun Dr.M manipulation of the judiciary.!
The AG, IGP, MACC and Minsiter are lying when they say the case is still open. It means they will not prosecute and WILL NOT prosecute unless Lingam or Chin step forward and confess! And we know how likely that will be.
dpp
We are all of 1 race, the Human Race
9 Neil 1 November 2009 @ 6:29 pm
The blogger has written something important. It should be printed, laminated and kept for GE13.
A lot of injustices have been whitewashed in this country. As GE13 draws nearer, more will be done. It’s just double standards, getting away with crimes and blatantly destroying integrity of the very institutions which hold up this country and or society. All in the interest of the politics of some individuals.
Notice that they have not moved on the two remaining charges on the exMB. If they do, they know Selangor will remain with Pakatan since that guy is their only spearhead to wrest back. That’s why he’s quiet while the game’s afoot to muscle in on PKR in the state by eroding some of the MP support before the eyes of the rakyat.
The rakyat must be steadfast in seeing everything clearly all the time. Miss a beat and the sleight-of-hand will take place. There will be no second chance after that. And that’s their game.
10 nstman 2 November 2009 @ 12:18 pm
In Bolehland, justice everything is possible. Justice is possible. V.K. Lingam is possible. Tian Chua was convicted of biting a policeman because the policeman said so. No other proof needed. The policeman’s word is law. the cop’s word agaisnt Tian. This is One Justice. Lingam was caught in the act. Government says not enough proof. Correct, correct. More proof needed. So no case. Brilliant Patail. Fantastic. No need for written judgements. Only in Bolehland. As of today, 99.99 per cent of cases do not even have written judgments. Everything kautim.
11 Awesome 2 November 2009 @ 7:07 pm
YaY! your blog is back up!
Happy!
Hey I just subscribed to your awesome blog via Google Reader & it only has updates till the March 13, 2007 entry .. could it have anything to do with this rss?
URL: http://aisehman.org/?feed=rss2
12 Dean Arif 7 November 2009 @ 10:45 pm
1Malaysia = legislative, executive, judiciary, police, army, spr all in 1Pocket!
13 sad_klguy 12 November 2009 @ 12:27 pm
If Malaysia really want to become independent,
a) legislative
b) judiciary
c) enforcement
MUST be INDEPENDENT and report to Parliment and not to our PM.
14 iskandar 16 November 2009 @ 3:46 pm
What are the issues here?
1. kalau org yg mengadu tu hebat sangat sila la beri apakah kesalahan yg dilakukan oleh Mahathir di bawah undang-undang Malaysia.
2. Kalau Lingam dan fairuz terlibat dgn rasuah cuba beri apakah rasuah tersebut.
3. Jikalau sekadar melobi aku rasa tak salah pun.. di US dan UK pun berlaku aktiviti melobi,cuma jika melibatkan RASUAH itu baru salah..
4. jika betul Lingam terlibat dgn hakim minta tolong buat PENGHAKIMAN itu memang salah..
5. tetapi sekali lagi cuba kamu semua ORANG-ORANG yg HEBAT menunjuk salah orang tolong terangkan APAKAH KESALAHAN YANG MAHATHIR lakukan??
15 toolan 17 November 2009 @ 2:05 pm
isk, diam diam lah
Leave a Reply